Author Topic: E6 Design  (Read 68451 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Tim Noyce

  • Former_Member
  • Guru's Guru
  • *****
  • Posts: 1126
  • Karma: +44/-1
Re: E6 Design
« Reply #45 on: February 23, 2010, 09:17:18 AM »
This is one smooooooth lookin' plug. Excellent craftsmanship Mr Croote.

Offline andy_peters

  • Class member
  • Guru's Guru
  • *****
  • Posts: 588
  • Karma: +23/-1
Re: E6 Design
« Reply #46 on: February 23, 2010, 06:20:29 PM »
Kevin,

Can you clarify you first comment as you reference the E6 twice.  Is the E6 designed for lower wind speeds than the E5 or the other way round?

Andy

Offline kevin_ellway

  • Newb
  • *
  • Posts: 37
  • Karma: +0/-1
Re: E6 Design
« Reply #47 on: February 23, 2010, 06:43:41 PM »
Kevin,

Can you clarify you first comment as you reference the E6 twice.  Is the E6 designed for lower wind speeds than the E5 or the other way round?

Andy

Yes, a typo. The E6 has been optimised for lower hull speeds than the E5. That said, it is important to realise that the main factors influencing the drag of a hull are its length, weight, waterline beam. There's not a lot you can do with these in the Cherub, so the performance differences between the E5 and E6 are likely to be small. Crew weight, for example, would have a much bigger impact than the differences in hull shapes - a lightweight crew in an E5 would still outperform a heavier crew in an E6 in light winds. Rig set up, sail trim and sailing skills are, as ever, of paramount importance.
Design is all about compromise - if you improve one area of performance, you'll almost certainly degrade another.

Hope this helps.


Offline phil_kirk

  • Former_Member
  • Guru's Guru
  • *****
  • Posts: 1722
  • Karma: +10/-2
Re: E6 Design
« Reply #48 on: February 24, 2010, 07:25:07 AM »
Quote
a lightweight crew in an E5 would still outperform a heavier crew in an E6 in light winds.

Phew!

Offline dave_ching

  • Administrator
  • Guru's Guru
  • *****
  • Posts: 584
  • Karma: +20/-2
Re: E6 Design
« Reply #49 on: February 26, 2010, 03:06:59 PM »
Phil, you will have to stop eating those coco pops!

Offline phil_kirk

  • Former_Member
  • Guru's Guru
  • *****
  • Posts: 1722
  • Karma: +10/-2
Re: E6 Design
« Reply #50 on: March 02, 2010, 02:14:58 PM »
Nooooooooooo! :(

Offline paul_croote

  • Class member
  • Apprentice Guru
  • ***
  • Posts: 199
  • Karma: +5/-0
Re: E6 Design
« Reply #51 on: March 23, 2010, 11:46:09 PM »
Latest pics, looks very small along side Atum!

Offline Banshee Ambulance

  • Guru's Assistant
  • ****
  • Posts: 367
  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: E6 Design
« Reply #52 on: March 24, 2010, 01:01:22 AM »
I like the all in one jib track/rack bar setup. (if that is what it is?) How much freeboard does it have relative to the E5/Slug?

Offline daryl_wilkinson

  • Guru's Guru
  • *****
  • Posts: 553
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • Clearthinking Creative
Re: E6 Design
« Reply #53 on: March 24, 2010, 08:21:58 AM »
Looking good.

Nice Open 60 inspired gunwales, yet another element that was meant to be on my boat but didn't make it. So I'm pleased someone has gone down that route. I saw an i14 at the dinghy show that had gone that route too.

Offline paul_croote

  • Class member
  • Apprentice Guru
  • ***
  • Posts: 199
  • Karma: +5/-0
Re: E6 Design
« Reply #54 on: March 24, 2010, 08:54:57 AM »
10cm lower at the bow and 2.5cm higher at the stern. The higher chine and flange makes it look less than it is. The flange will be much smaller on the finished hull.

Offline Will_Lee

  • Former_Member
  • Guru's Guru
  • *****
  • Posts: 1290
  • Karma: +4/-0
Re: E6 Design
« Reply #55 on: March 24, 2010, 09:04:30 AM »


Gunwhales like this?

That's not what the E6 has - those are external flanges you can see. See prev page.
« Last Edit: March 24, 2010, 09:06:58 AM by Will_Lee »

Offline phil_kirk

  • Former_Member
  • Guru's Guru
  • *****
  • Posts: 1722
  • Karma: +10/-2
Re: E6 Design
« Reply #56 on: March 24, 2010, 11:58:30 AM »
I love the bridge deck.  You could do something similar at the back and pin the gantry off it too. I also see that you have the stanchions ready in the background. ;)

The keel boat inspired roll gunnels would be quite good so long as the spray doesn't sweep your feet off the gunnel.  Would also create more space for getting back in between the hull and the racks. Does mean that the spare mainsheet would go over the side more easily though. lots of plusses and minuses.

Looks like it's cookie's time to get busy and start making boats now.

Offline simon_jones

  • Former_Member
  • Guru's Guru
  • *****
  • Posts: 995
  • Karma: +13/-0
Re: E6 Design
« Reply #57 on: March 24, 2010, 04:38:55 PM »
Looking vey good Paul, as you say Phil it's nearly time for Mr Cook to get busy. Then us to get vey busy!

Offline daryl_wilkinson

  • Guru's Guru
  • *****
  • Posts: 553
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • Clearthinking Creative
Re: E6 Design
« Reply #58 on: March 25, 2010, 08:35:21 AM »
I love the bridge deck.  You could do something similar at the back and pin the gantry off it too. I also see that you have the stanchions ready in the background. ;)

The keel boat inspired roll gunnels would be quite good so long as the spray doesn't sweep your feet off the gunnel.  Would also create more space for getting back in between the hull and the racks. Does mean that the spare mainsheet would go over the side more easily though. lots of plusses and minuses.

Looks like it's cookie's time to get busy and start making boats now.

I'd better get my eye sight checked! The roll gunnels as well as easing entry have a plus when you taz it around the front and hit them. A bigger area to disperse the impact on your arse / ribs / head etc..... Ben broke FLC's gunwale doing that, but he never seemed to be able to stay attached when I was driving?! :-)

Offline paul_croote

  • Class member
  • Apprentice Guru
  • ***
  • Posts: 199
  • Karma: +5/-0
Re: E6 Design
« Reply #59 on: April 12, 2010, 10:40:30 PM »
Pictures of completed deck plug, It seems to be crying out to have fittings/racks stuck on and taken out for a blast, shame    
« Last Edit: April 12, 2010, 10:44:04 PM by paul_croote »