Hi all
To end the speculation:
a) The E6 is designed optimised for lower speeds / lower windstrengths than the E6. It has more rocker, lower Cp, lower Ws
b) It is not a more extreme version or development of the Banshee: it has come about from evaluating scores of different hullforms, including those with step chines and non immersed chines. Cherub designs, within a given rule set, will coalesce over time , so they will inevitably look similar - look at the Bieker and Morrison 14s for example. It is probably closer to Alex Valling's Nuplex than the Banshee.
c) The differences in drags between any of the modern hulls will be very small, much smaller than the difference that can be made by setting the T foil at the correct angle, trimming the boat and sails correctly. Drag is mostly a function of length, weight and waterline beam and there's not a lot you can do about any of these!
d) This is really for John H - if you speak to Phil K, you will realise just how much putting a new boat on the water costs - and how many zillion man hours it takes. Whilst I'd love you to have an E5/6, my advice would be the same as Pete's - If you've got the cash, go buy Ronin and spend your time sailing - it will place you far further up the race track than building a new boat.
e) the frames are a conformal surface 9mm inside the hull; so the bow will look very skinny until skinned. That said, the E5 looked skinny compared to previous boats - it's just what you get used to looking at.
Cheers
Kevin