Author Topic: spinnaker halyard system  (Read 30510 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline john_hamilton

  • Guru's Guru
  • *****
  • Posts: 576
  • Karma: +0/-0
  • cherubing is a word
spinnaker halyard system
« on: December 23, 2009, 01:21:53 AM »
can anyone see anything glaringly wrong with this system????
The pessimist complains about the wind; the optimist hopes it will change; the realist adjusts the sail

cherub 2645 - cheese before bedtime

Offline ross_burkin

  • Guru's Guru
  • *****
  • Posts: 602
  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: spinnaker halyard system
« Reply #1 on: December 23, 2009, 04:56:43 AM »
What is the black line for?
2675 Fuzzy Logic  97/05 rules

Serious plannage in the works...

roland_trim

  • Guest
Re: spinnaker halyard system
« Reply #2 on: December 23, 2009, 10:35:47 AM »
Comments below are based on BS, EJ and the Aunti Dot. The key to a good system is that everything lines up, this reduces friction and halyard twisting.

I'd suggest ensuring the cleat and hoist pulley are in a straight line - or you'll burn through even a cam-cleat in a couple of hoists if not.

The pully at the back wants to lead the take downhaul in a straight line from the bow hoop to fitting (i.e. along the bag)or this will cheesewire the bag. This back pulley does not want to flop about or be at any risk of flipping and jamming.  On 2699 the back pulley is on a plate a fair bit forward of the transom, on EJ it is mounted on the rear rack support, about 40cm from the centreline of the boat.

Putting the kite sheet takeup so it draggs the sheets down the tube at the bow is novel. I think the sheets will simply jam against the bag/kite, but it might be a genium. On EJ we elasticated the kite sheet and added a single takeup ring - this drags the middle of the kite sheet forward on elastic (2699 has 2x forward pullers and no elasticated sheet).

Both EJ and Aunti use the motion of the pole to tighten/activate the sheet take up (elastic connects to base of pole, through a pulley at bow, under the mast support structure and then to take-up ring on sheet). The system drawn looks like it supplys a constant pull? Elastic is not needed to bring the pole back in.

We went a bit elastic in rope mad on EJ and did all the control lines. The other bit that works a treat was to elasticate the bit of the spinni halyard that is adjacent to the mast when kite is hoisted (sits between the top of the mast and the kite bag when kite is down). This results in a halyard that always has some tension in it and no need for any other takeups and no tension in the downhaul in light winds. This sounds a bit strange at first, but the key is that as soon as you start to hoist the rope pulls tight and the halyard rope takes over and performs as normal.

Offline john_hamilton

  • Guru's Guru
  • *****
  • Posts: 576
  • Karma: +0/-0
  • cherubing is a word
Re: spinnaker halyard system
« Reply #3 on: December 23, 2009, 10:47:26 AM »
Roland,
that bit about the elastic in rope is pure genius! What type and diameter rope did you use? Also this was only meant as a scetch and i understand the importance of it all being in a straight line. The spinnaker sheet take ups arent inteanded to take the sheets all the way to the tube now but are basically d-rings attached to some elastic that goes to the kite hoop around a block and then to the bas of the pole.
Ross, the black bit is elastic. I have already changed i to a forwArd pull due to suddenly realising i was dealing wih a 12ft boat instead of the 49er that the elastic system is based on.
John
The pessimist complains about the wind; the optimist hopes it will change; the realist adjusts the sail

cherub 2645 - cheese before bedtime

Offline john_hamilton

  • Guru's Guru
  • *****
  • Posts: 576
  • Karma: +0/-0
  • cherubing is a word
Re: spinnaker halyard system
« Reply #4 on: December 23, 2009, 02:36:22 PM »
also roland, what length or halyard have you finally ended up with?#
The pessimist complains about the wind; the optimist hopes it will change; the realist adjusts the sail

cherub 2645 - cheese before bedtime

Offline daryl_wilkinson

  • Guru's Guru
  • *****
  • Posts: 553
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • Clearthinking Creative
Re: spinnaker halyard system
« Reply #5 on: December 24, 2009, 04:48:31 PM »
here's mine... the floating ring a the transom to turn the rope to the rear block is now a block. Make sure your sock has enough volume.




Offline john_hamilton

  • Guru's Guru
  • *****
  • Posts: 576
  • Karma: +0/-0
  • cherubing is a word
Re: spinnaker halyard system
« Reply #6 on: December 24, 2009, 05:12:59 PM »
daryl,
what is the function of the back-to-back blocks on the pole launcher? iv senn it on the 49er aswell but what does it do?
The pessimist complains about the wind; the optimist hopes it will change; the realist adjusts the sail

cherub 2645 - cheese before bedtime

roland_trim

  • Guest
Re: spinnaker halyard system
« Reply #7 on: December 24, 2009, 05:51:00 PM »
John,
Are you asking about the travelling back-back block. It is a 2:1 against your crew that means you get more pole travel from a block that can only move from  bow to the block that sends the halyard up the mast. If your crew moans about the loss from the double block, just point out that there is a 2:1 for on one side and the two cancel out (forget that this is meaningless as the pole is a pain to pull anyway :0) ). 

It is possible to drop one of these to leave you with a single block and give the crew more purchase, but then only get a much smaller pole travel. Wives tales will also swear blind that this means the kite will bag out early and drop in the water.

roland_trim

  • Guest
Re: spinnaker halyard system
« Reply #8 on: December 24, 2009, 06:00:36 PM »
what length or halyard have you finally ended up with?#
21m of D12. If you are kitting out a whole boat there are several friends who can help (Mr Barton included).

We used a huge ammount of 3mm  D12 on the last 2 rigs - BMG has now bought a large quantity sucessfully from  http://myworld.ebay.co.uk/schoppenpopp/ds . Remember to tell him which colour you need.

Offline john_hamilton

  • Guru's Guru
  • *****
  • Posts: 576
  • Karma: +0/-0
  • cherubing is a word
Re: spinnaker halyard system
« Reply #9 on: December 24, 2009, 06:45:10 PM »
ok thanks roland, i was worried because digby is having trouble pulling cheese's pole out fully at the moment and was wondering about losing the block, but i think i will now keep it on the new boat and hope hes bigger by then!!! thanks for the d12 tip. also which mr barton? pete or james?
john
The pessimist complains about the wind; the optimist hopes it will change; the realist adjusts the sail

cherub 2645 - cheese before bedtime

Offline Will_Lee

  • Former_Member
  • Guru's Guru
  • *****
  • Posts: 1290
  • Karma: +4/-0
Re: spinnaker halyard system
« Reply #10 on: December 24, 2009, 08:25:57 PM »
Hi John,

That system is pretty much how we had Aqua's. The changes we made when putting Atum together were to have a double floating block because Atum needed more pole travel. Doing this also allows you to put the pole-launch rope through a sheave in the heel of the pole and use the same rope as the tack line. This means that you can get the kite in even if the pole jams. However, in late 2006 we changed back over to the system where the tack line is separate because that way the hard bit of hoisting the spin is at a different time to the hard bit of launching the pole. That is, the difficult parts are at opposite ends of the hoist.

Will (on call on Christmas Eve!)

Offline john_hamilton

  • Guru's Guru
  • *****
  • Posts: 576
  • Karma: +0/-0
  • cherubing is a word
Re: spinnaker halyard system
« Reply #11 on: December 26, 2009, 01:31:42 AM »
any tips on keeping friction to a minimum apart from obviously having a few blocks as possible involved
The pessimist complains about the wind; the optimist hopes it will change; the realist adjusts the sail

cherub 2645 - cheese before bedtime

Offline ross_burkin

  • Guru's Guru
  • *****
  • Posts: 602
  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: spinnaker halyard system
« Reply #12 on: December 26, 2009, 09:19:06 PM »
Thinner rope = less friction.
2675 Fuzzy Logic  97/05 rules

Serious plannage in the works...

Offline Phil Alderson

  • Administrator
  • Guru's Guru
  • *****
  • Posts: 1148
  • Karma: +28/-0
    • www.largssc.co.uk
Re: spinnaker halyard system
« Reply #13 on: December 27, 2009, 06:26:40 PM »
Cloth choice for the sock can make a big difference, the stuff I had on Primal was quite sticky, some of the woven stuff also seems quite rough. I have to say I have yet to find anything I am truly happy with. Regularly spraying with Mclube is good

I like to keep a large radius on the chute mouth both at the front and the back, remember to think how the kite goes out of the sock and the interface between sock and chute. i also think that avoiding any internal sharp corners also prevents jambs on the drop. A large radius on the sides is a good idea, to help get it back in when it is full of shrimp.

At the top of the mast I have a stand-off to ensure that the block is not hard against the mast, or it will rub a groove in the mast.

3218 Zero Gravitas
2683 Pocket Rocket For Sale

Offline john_hamilton

  • Guru's Guru
  • *****
  • Posts: 576
  • Karma: +0/-0
  • cherubing is a word
Re: spinnaker halyard system
« Reply #14 on: December 27, 2009, 06:43:33 PM »
phil, what is the best material you have found yet then?
The pessimist complains about the wind; the optimist hopes it will change; the realist adjusts the sail

cherub 2645 - cheese before bedtime