UK-Cherub Forum
Cherub Chat => Tech Chat => Topic started by: Stuberry on January 14, 2009, 12:39:07 PM
-
(http://www.parasailor.co.za/dyn_images/id_3_t_photo_gallery.jpg)(http://www.parasailor.co.za/dyn_documents/image001_animated.gif)
Further info here (http://www.parasailor.co.za/)
-
but we would spend so long trying to work out how to measure it we would never get to the bar!
-
interesting. For us it would work much better in a conventional pole to mast-head hoist. A parafoil on end. Two skins held together with baffles and gauze at the leading edge. I suppose it would be half the actual area in size ( 10.5 sqm ) as it would be essentially two spinnakers. Ummmm....
-
but we would spend so long trying to work out how to measure it we would never get to the bar!
I agree!
-
Strange... Think about tip loss and aspect ratio chaps:-)
-
but we would spend so long trying to work out how to measure it we would never get to the bar!
I agree!
Well Tom its simple, we will have to get you one of these to play with:
http://www.metris.com/products/laser_scanners/lc50/
-
but we would spend so long trying to work out how to measure it we would never get to the bar!
I agree!
Well Tom its simple, we will have to get you one of these to play with:
http://www.metris.com/products/laser_scanners/lc50/
I agree!
-
I saw one of these on a HOD 35 yacht 2.5 years ago. Appeared to work.
If as intended it gives greater lift forward you would never have to worry about letting off the T foil at the windward mark. I'm not sure how it would work in an asymmetric though.
it's good to see above that Tom is being very agreeable to day. :)
-
How do you gybe the flap part when on an asymmetric?
-
So lift at both ends. Hulls fully airbourne?
-
So lift at both ends. Hulls fully airbourne?
That bit's easy. Its the coming down again that's troublesome. Trust me on this.