Author Topic: Future Cherub  (Read 28704 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline daryl_wilkinson

  • Guru's Guru
  • *****
  • Posts: 553
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • Clearthinking Creative
Re: Future Cherub
« Reply #30 on: April 04, 2009, 01:13:16 PM »
I think the really interesting thing in that report is...

When foiling, the boat is much more stable and easier to sail than a conventional R.

There has been plenty of outside speculation that "the boats will be harder to sail" on foils. It turns out that the R on foils is actually more stable and much easier to control. It didn't take long to acclimate to the decrease in lateral resistance from the much smaller vertical main foil, and stop falling into windward when wiring.

Offline Banshee Ambulance

  • Guru's Assistant
  • ****
  • Posts: 367
  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: Future Cherub
« Reply #31 on: May 11, 2009, 05:10:58 PM »
It is interesting that the R Class rejected T-foils as they were too draggy downwind. I hear the 14s are starting to question them as well. Is it just because the cherub is so short they are of benefit to us?

roland_trim

  • Guest
Re: Future Cherub
« Reply #32 on: May 11, 2009, 05:58:29 PM »
It may well also be a function of flat. The T-Foil only gives a massive hit when the mast is bolt upright - from looking at the piccies this is not the case downwind with their rigs?


Offline Will_Lee

  • Former_Member
  • Guru's Guru
  • *****
  • Posts: 1290
  • Karma: +4/-0
Re: Future Cherub
« Reply #33 on: May 11, 2009, 06:07:34 PM »
I hear the 14s are starting to question them as well.

Can you post a link about this?

Offline daryl_wilkinson

  • Guru's Guru
  • *****
  • Posts: 553
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • Clearthinking Creative
Re: Future Cherub
« Reply #34 on: May 11, 2009, 06:27:50 PM »

Offline daryl_wilkinson

  • Guru's Guru
  • *****
  • Posts: 553
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • Clearthinking Creative
Re: Future Cherub
« Reply #35 on: May 11, 2009, 06:44:37 PM »
It may well also be a function of flat. The T-Foil only gives a massive hit when the mast is bolt upright - from looking at the piccies this is not the case downwind with their rigs?



I think it is more to do with the fact that they have a clear and unrestricted aim of making the boat as fast as possible. Given that there skill level is high by virtue of sailing in consistently high wind strength and use of larger kites negates the need to damping downwind for extra speed from control. The gain upwind did not benefit them downwind. So it was logical to move to a fully foiling boat, which has significant advantages in speed up and downwind as well as damping for improved control.

Offline Banshee Ambulance

  • Guru's Assistant
  • ****
  • Posts: 367
  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: Future Cherub
« Reply #36 on: May 11, 2009, 10:54:32 PM »
I hear the 14s are starting to question them as well.

Can you post a link about this?

Haven't read anything as such, just the chat I hear from folks in the uni club. May be rubbish - I don't know.

Offline ross_burkin

  • Guru's Guru
  • *****
  • Posts: 602
  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: Future Cherub
« Reply #37 on: May 12, 2009, 12:29:17 AM »
It may well also be a function of flat. The T-Foil only gives a massive hit when the mast is bolt upright - from looking at the piccies this is not the case downwind with their rigs?



I'm not sure how the mast position effects T-foil speed advantage (unless you mean capsized and not capsized). If the R's sail more bow up than normal then they would just change the angle of the foil relative to the water.
2675 Fuzzy Logic  97/05 rules

Serious plannage in the works...

Offline Phil Alderson

  • Administrator
  • Guru's Guru
  • *****
  • Posts: 1144
  • Karma: +28/-0
    • www.largssc.co.uk
Re: Future Cherub
« Reply #38 on: May 12, 2009, 02:14:22 AM »
The 14's are not allowed to trapeze behind the transom so there is limited scope for setting the T to lift down wind.
3218 Zero Gravitas
2683 Pocket Rocket For Sale

Offline phil_kirk

  • Former_Member
  • Guru's Guru
  • *****
  • Posts: 1722
  • Karma: +10/-2
Re: Future Cherub
« Reply #39 on: May 12, 2009, 01:49:44 PM »
They also have 2 feet more hull in front of the transom so gain all the benifits of controlability from the extra waterline length.

roland_trim

  • Guest
Re: Future Cherub
« Reply #40 on: May 12, 2009, 02:14:52 PM »
I'm not sure how the mast position effects T-foil speed advantage

I'm not completely sure how this works myself. But the foil on Born Slippy certainly only seems to give use a boost when the mast is not leaning too far left/right.

A stab:
The lift from the foil acts along the line of the rudder blade. If the boat is healed then some of that lift then starts working against the back of the hull steering the boat (sin30 ~ 0.5) and needing to be corrected. The loss of lift is only small (cos 30 ~0.87), but there appears to be a whole load of extra drag. I'm sure the theorists out there can reference the reason, although it may have nothing to do with this and simply be a function of the slug hull shape.

Offline Banshee Ambulance

  • Guru's Assistant
  • ****
  • Posts: 367
  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: Future Cherub
« Reply #41 on: July 21, 2009, 08:11:40 PM »
How would the L3s main spray rail count as a chine with respect to our rules? Im thinking of scaling the L3 for a new boat. Where would the chine beam measurements be taken from if its a spray rail rather than a chine?